Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye
World Senior Teams +50, 2016 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29).
Analyze this game
Open Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye on the CipherChess board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Open the Analysis BoardMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Peter Eiselt (2012)
- Black
- Niels Mollmann Boye (1862)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- World Senior Teams +50
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29)
About this chess game
This chess game between Peter Eiselt (2012) and Niels Mollmann Boye (1862) was played at World Senior Teams +50 in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (A29). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Peter Eiselt games or Niels Mollmann Boye games? This Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye?
Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Niels Mollmann Boye.
What opening was played in Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Four Knights Variation, Fianchetto Line (ECO A29).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Peter Eiselt vs Niels Mollmann Boye, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.