David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco
2012 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Zanoletty Garcia (1991)
- Black
- Roberto Enjuto Velasco (2130)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Zanoletty Garcia (1991) and Roberto Enjuto Velasco (2130) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Zanoletty Garcia games or Roberto Enjuto Velasco games? This David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco?
David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco (2012) finished 1–0, a win for David Zanoletty Garcia.
What opening was played in David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Zanoletty Garcia vs Roberto Enjuto Velasco, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.