Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos
2012 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Open (B32).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Roberto Enjuto Velasco (2130)
- Black
- Francisco Bravo De Los Santos (1808)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Open (B32)
About this chess game
This chess game between Roberto Enjuto Velasco (2130) and Francisco Bravo De Los Santos (1808) was played in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Open (B32). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Roberto Enjuto Velasco games or Francisco Bravo De Los Santos games? This Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Open.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos?
Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Roberto Enjuto Velasco.
What opening was played in Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Open (ECO B32).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Roberto Enjuto Velasco vs Francisco Bravo De Los Santos, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.