Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga
2015 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dario Palomino (1890)
- Black
- Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga (2079)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dario Palomino (1890) and Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga (2079) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (A08). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dario Palomino games or Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga games? This Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga?
Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga?
The game opened with the King's Indian Attack: Sicilian Variation (ECO A08).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dario Palomino vs Daniel Eduardo Lopez Idarraga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.