Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino
2017 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Cristian David Ocampo (1846)
- Black
- Dario Palomino (1891)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14)
About this chess game
This chess game between Cristian David Ocampo (1846) and Dario Palomino (1891) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (A14). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Cristian David Ocampo games or Dario Palomino games? This Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino?
Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense, Neo-Catalan Declined (ECO A14).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Cristian David Ocampo vs Dario Palomino, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.