Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca
Americana, 1999 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vinicius de Abreu Marques (2246)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Americana
- Year
- 1999
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vinicius de Abreu Marques (2246) and Eduardo Leitao Fonseca was played at Americana in 1999 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vinicius de Abreu Marques games or Eduardo Leitao Fonseca games? This Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca?
Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca (1999) finished 1–0, a win for Vinicius de Abreu Marques.
What opening was played in Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vinicius de Abreu Marques vs Eduardo Leitao Fonseca, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.