Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques
2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Fernando Viana Da Costa (2265)
- Black
- Vinicius de Abreu Marques (2370)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30)
About this chess game
This chess game between Fernando Viana Da Costa (2265) and Vinicius de Abreu Marques (2370) was played in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (B30). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Fernando Viana Da Costa games or Vinicius de Abreu Marques games? This Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques?
Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian (ECO B30).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Fernando Viana Da Costa vs Vinicius de Abreu Marques, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.