Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin
Chigorin Mem Open, 2009 · Result 0–1 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Antonina Markovskaya (2094)
- Black
- Vladimir Frolochkin (2305)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Chigorin Mem Open
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55)
About this chess game
This chess game between Antonina Markovskaya (2094) and Vladimir Frolochkin (2305) was played at Chigorin Mem Open in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (C55). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Antonina Markovskaya games or Vladimir Frolochkin games? This Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin?
Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Vladimir Frolochkin.
What opening was played in Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense (ECO C55).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Antonina Markovskaya vs Vladimir Frolochkin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.