Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya
2010 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kristina Kolesnikova (1889)
- Black
- Antonina Markovskaya (2093)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kristina Kolesnikova (1889) and Antonina Markovskaya (2093) was played in 2010 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (B24). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kristina Kolesnikova games or Antonina Markovskaya games? This Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya?
Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya (2010) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Closed, Fianchetto Variation (ECO B24).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kristina Kolesnikova vs Antonina Markovskaya, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.