Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi
80. ch-BRA S/F 1 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game (C50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Diogo Duarte Guimaraes (2216)
- Black
- Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi (2101)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 80. ch-BRA S/F 1 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Italian Game (C50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Diogo Duarte Guimaraes (2216) and Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi (2101) was played at 80. ch-BRA S/F 1 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game (C50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Diogo Duarte Guimaraes games or Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi games? This Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi?
Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Diogo Duarte Guimaraes.
What opening was played in Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi?
The game opened with the Italian Game (ECO C50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Diogo Duarte Guimaraes vs Luiz Antonio Bardaro Manzi, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.