Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes
III Sampa Chess Open - RPD, 2026 · Result 1–0 · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Luigy Lira De Siqueira (2311)
- Black
- Diogo Duarte Guimaraes (2272)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- III Sampa Chess Open - RPD
- Year
- 2026
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Luigy Lira De Siqueira (2311) and Diogo Duarte Guimaraes (2272) was played at III Sampa Chess Open - RPD in 2026 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Luigy Lira De Siqueira games or Diogo Duarte Guimaraes games? This Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes?
Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes (2026) finished 1–0, a win for Luigy Lira De Siqueira.
What opening was played in Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Luigy Lira De Siqueira vs Diogo Duarte Guimaraes, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.