Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas
2013 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Frederico Gazel Pereira (2308)
- Black
- Julio Eimard De Freitas (1890)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51)
About this chess game
This chess game between Frederico Gazel Pereira (2308) and Julio Eimard De Freitas (1890) was played in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (B51). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Frederico Gazel Pereira games or Julio Eimard De Freitas games? This Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas?
Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Moscow Variation (ECO B51).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Frederico Gazel Pereira vs Julio Eimard De Freitas, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.