Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira
2017 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rodrigo Machado Mendes (2028)
- Black
- Frederico Gazel Pereira (2258)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rodrigo Machado Mendes (2028) and Frederico Gazel Pereira (2258) was played in 2017 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (B42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rodrigo Machado Mendes games or Frederico Gazel Pereira games? This Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira?
Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira (2017) finished 0–1, a win for Frederico Gazel Pereira.
What opening was played in Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Kan Variation, Modern Variation (ECO B42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rodrigo Machado Mendes vs Frederico Gazel Pereira, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.