Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo
2014 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leonardo Sanches Froes (1955)
- Black
- Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2032)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2014
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leonardo Sanches Froes (1955) and Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2032) was played in 2014 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leonardo Sanches Froes games or Vinicius Lemos Galindo games? This Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo?
Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2014) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leonardo Sanches Froes vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.