Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo
2018 · Result 0–1 · Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mauro Cezar Raggiotto (1483)
- Black
- Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2025)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mauro Cezar Raggiotto (1483) and Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2025) was played in 2018 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (D02). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mauro Cezar Raggiotto games or Vinicius Lemos Galindo games? This Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo?
Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo (2018) finished 0–1, a win for Vinicius Lemos Galindo.
What opening was played in Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo?
The game opened with the Queen's Pawn Game: Zukertort Variation (ECO D02).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mauro Cezar Raggiotto vs Vinicius Lemos Galindo, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.