Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich
Berlin GER, 9. Lichtenberger Sommer, 2010 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Daniel Fischer (1941)
- Black
- Wiede Friedrich (2183)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Berlin GER, 9. Lichtenberger Sommer
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11)
About this chess game
This chess game between Daniel Fischer (1941) and Wiede Friedrich (2183) was played at Berlin GER, 9. Lichtenberger Sommer in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (A11). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Daniel Fischer games or Wiede Friedrich games? This Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich?
Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Wiede Friedrich.
What opening was played in Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich?
The game opened with the English Opening: Caro-Kann Defensive System (ECO A11).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Daniel Fischer vs Wiede Friedrich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.