Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno
2011 · Result 1–0 · Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sergio Roberto Alves Farias (2126)
- Black
- Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2167)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sergio Roberto Alves Farias (2126) and Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2167) was played in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Indian Defense: Normal Variation (A50). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sergio Roberto Alves Farias games or Marlos de Almedia Damasceno games? This Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Indian Defense: Normal Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno?
Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Sergio Roberto Alves Farias.
What opening was played in Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno?
The game opened with the Indian Defense: Normal Variation (ECO A50).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sergio Roberto Alves Farias vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.