Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno
2020 · Result 0–1 · Four Knights Game (C47).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Leticia Figueira Loricchio (1164)
- Black
- Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2145)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2020
- Opening
- Four Knights Game (C47)
About this chess game
This chess game between Leticia Figueira Loricchio (1164) and Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2145) was played in 2020 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Four Knights Game (C47). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Leticia Figueira Loricchio games or Marlos de Almedia Damasceno games? This Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Four Knights Game.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno?
Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno (2020) finished 0–1, a win for Marlos de Almedia Damasceno.
What opening was played in Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno?
The game opened with the Four Knights Game (ECO C47).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Leticia Figueira Loricchio vs Marlos de Almedia Damasceno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.