Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge
2011 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Josef Beutelhoff (2119)
- Black
- Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2098)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Josef Beutelhoff (2119) and Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2098) was played in 2011 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Josef Beutelhoff games or Torsten, Dr. Hoge games? This Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge?
Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2011) finished 0–1, a win for Torsten, Dr. Hoge.
What opening was played in Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Josef Beutelhoff vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.