Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge
2019 · Result 0–1 · Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Winfried Boenigk (1765)
- Black
- Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2098)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38)
About this chess game
This chess game between Winfried Boenigk (1765) and Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2098) was played in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (E38). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Winfried Boenigk games or Torsten, Dr. Hoge games? This Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge?
Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Torsten, Dr. Hoge.
What opening was played in Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge?
The game opened with the Nimzo-Indian Defense: Classical Variation, Berlin Variation (ECO E38).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Winfried Boenigk vs Torsten, Dr. Hoge, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.