Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima
ITT, 2006 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Marisa Zuriel (2186)
- Black
- Duarte Lima (1615)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- ITT
- Year
- 2006
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48)
About this chess game
This chess game between Marisa Zuriel (2186) and Duarte Lima (1615) was played at ITT in 2006 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (B48). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Marisa Zuriel games or Duarte Lima games? This Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima?
Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima (2006) finished 0–1, a win for Duarte Lima.
What opening was played in Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation, English Attack (ECO B48).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Marisa Zuriel vs Duarte Lima, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.