Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet
WLS/SRCCC/19/D1 (WLS), 2019 · Result ½–½ · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Slavko Zunkovic (2279)
- Black
- Daniel Edward Parmet (1929)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- WLS/SRCCC/19/D1 (WLS)
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80)
About this chess game
This chess game between Slavko Zunkovic (2279) and Daniel Edward Parmet (1929) was played at WLS/SRCCC/19/D1 (WLS) in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (B80). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Slavko Zunkovic games or Daniel Edward Parmet games? This Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation (ECO B80).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Slavko Zunkovic vs Daniel Edward Parmet, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.