Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino
1986 · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Mario Zuniga
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 1986
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Mario Zuniga and Francisco Javier Navas Palomino was played in 1986 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Mario Zuniga games or Francisco Javier Navas Palomino games? This Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino?
Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino (1986) finished 1–0, a win for Mario Zuniga.
What opening was played in Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Mario Zuniga vs Francisco Javier Navas Palomino, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.