Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin
RUS/Winter-2016 (RUS), 2016 · Result ½–½ · Petrov's Defense (C42).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wolfgang Zugrav (2152)
- Black
- Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin (2509)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- RUS/Winter-2016 (RUS)
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Petrov's Defense (C42)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wolfgang Zugrav (2152) and Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin (2509) was played at RUS/Winter-2016 (RUS) in 2016 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Petrov's Defense (C42). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wolfgang Zugrav games or Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin games? This Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Petrov's Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin?
Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin (2016) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin?
The game opened with the Petrov's Defense (ECO C42).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wolfgang Zugrav vs Sergey Konstantinovich Matyukhin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.