Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova
Krasnodar (Russia), date unknown · Result 0–1 · Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Oleg Zubkov (2109)
- Black
- Natalia Kolganova (2139)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Krasnodar (Russia)
- Opening
- Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34)
About this chess game
This chess game between Oleg Zubkov (2109) and Natalia Kolganova (2139) was played at Krasnodar (Russia) and finished 0–1. The opening was the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (D34). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Oleg Zubkov games or Natalia Kolganova games? This Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova?
Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova finished 0–1, a win for Natalia Kolganova.
What opening was played in Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova?
The game opened with the Tarrasch Defense: Classical Variation, Bogoljubow Variation (ECO D34).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Oleg Zubkov vs Natalia Kolganova, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.