Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly
2015 · Result 1–0 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Zubarev (2542)
- Black
- Baptiste Le Bailly (2067)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Zubarev (2542) and Baptiste Le Bailly (2067) was played in 2015 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Zubarev games or Baptiste Le Bailly games? This Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly?
Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly (2015) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Zubarev.
What opening was played in Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Zubarev vs Baptiste Le Bailly, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.