Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil
24. Staufer-Open, 2012 · Result 1–0 · King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexander Zubarev (2597)
- Black
- Harry Gohil (2322)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 24. Staufer-Open
- Year
- 2012
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexander Zubarev (2597) and Harry Gohil (2322) was played at 24. Staufer-Open in 2012 and finished 1–0. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (E81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexander Zubarev games or Harry Gohil games? This Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil?
Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil (2012) finished 1–0, a win for Alexander Zubarev.
What opening was played in Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Sämisch Variation, Normal Defense (ECO E81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexander Zubarev vs Harry Gohil, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.