Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak
28. Gniot Mem 2013, 2013 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: King's English Variation (A20).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Klaus Zschaebitz (2022)
- Black
- Wlodzimierz Oleniak (1849)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 28. Gniot Mem 2013
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation (A20)
About this chess game
This chess game between Klaus Zschaebitz (2022) and Wlodzimierz Oleniak (1849) was played at 28. Gniot Mem 2013 in 2013 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation (A20). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Klaus Zschaebitz games or Wlodzimierz Oleniak games? This Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak?
Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak (2013) finished 1–0, a win for Klaus Zschaebitz.
What opening was played in Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation (ECO A20).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Klaus Zschaebitz vs Wlodzimierz Oleniak, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.