Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric
Reggio Emilia, 1966 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Sylvain Zinser (2300)
- Black
- Aleksandar Ciric (1922)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Reggio Emilia
- Year
- 1966
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81)
About this chess game
This chess game between Sylvain Zinser (2300) and Aleksandar Ciric (1922) was played at Reggio Emilia in 1966 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (B81). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Sylvain Zinser games or Aleksandar Ciric games? This Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric?
Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric (1966) finished 0–1, a win for Aleksandar Ciric.
What opening was played in Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Scheveningen Variation, Keres Attack (ECO B81).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Sylvain Zinser vs Aleksandar Ciric, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.