Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner
2017 · Result ½–½ · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rolf Zimmermann (2178)
- Black
- Henrik Schloessner (2059)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rolf Zimmermann (2178) and Henrik Schloessner (2059) was played in 2017 and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (A21). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rolf Zimmermann games or Henrik Schloessner games? This Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner?
Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner (2017) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Sicilian (ECO A21).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rolf Zimmermann vs Henrik Schloessner, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.