Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen
2016 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Tobias Zimmermann (1820)
- Black
- Alexander Kelemen (1723)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2016
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49)
About this chess game
This chess game between Tobias Zimmermann (1820) and Alexander Kelemen (1723) was played in 2016 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (B49). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Tobias Zimmermann games or Alexander Kelemen games? This Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen?
Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen (2016) finished 0–1, a win for Alexander Kelemen.
What opening was played in Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Taimanov Variation, Bastrikov Variation (ECO B49).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Tobias Zimmermann vs Alexander Kelemen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.