Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga
2018 · Result 1–0 · Semi-Slav Defense (D43).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann (1962)
- Black
- Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga (1455)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2018
- Opening
- Semi-Slav Defense (D43)
About this chess game
This chess game between Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann (1962) and Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga (1455) was played in 2018 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Semi-Slav Defense (D43). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann games or Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga games? This Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Semi-Slav Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga?
Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga (2018) finished 1–0, a win for Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann.
What opening was played in Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga?
The game opened with the Semi-Slav Defense (ECO D43).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Kleber Renato P. Zimmermann vs Pedro Miguel Back Da Veiga, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.