Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek
2. LSS CUP P-00016, 2011 · Result 1–0 · Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn (2026)
- Black
- Drahomir Tylecek (1940)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 2. LSS CUP P-00016
- Year
- 2011
- Opening
- Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85)
About this chess game
This chess game between Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn (2026) and Drahomir Tylecek (1940) was played at 2. LSS CUP P-00016 in 2011 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (D85). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn games or Drahomir Tylecek games? This Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek?
Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek (2011) finished 1–0, a win for Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn.
What opening was played in Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek?
The game opened with the Grünfeld Defense: Exchange Variation (ECO D85).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Dmitrij Ziljbershtejn vs Drahomir Tylecek, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.