Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki
Ostravsky Konik Open A, 2019 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Vaidotas Zilinskas (2016)
- Black
- Franciszek Sernecki (2259)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- Ostravsky Konik Open A
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13)
About this chess game
This chess game between Vaidotas Zilinskas (2016) and Franciszek Sernecki (2259) was played at Ostravsky Konik Open A in 2019 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (A13). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Vaidotas Zilinskas games or Franciszek Sernecki games? This Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Agincourt Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki?
Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki (2019) finished 0–1, a win for Franciszek Sernecki.
What opening was played in Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki?
The game opened with the English Opening: Agincourt Defense (ECO A13).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Vaidotas Zilinskas vs Franciszek Sernecki, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.