Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic
CRO-chJ U19 Pula, date unknown · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Ivan Zilic (2056)
- Black
- Goran Segovic (2081)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- CRO-chJ U19 Pula
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73)
About this chess game
This chess game between Ivan Zilic (2056) and Goran Segovic (2081) was played at CRO-chJ U19 Pula and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (B73). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Ivan Zilic games or Goran Segovic games? This Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic?
Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic finished 0–1, a win for Goran Segovic.
What opening was played in Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Classical Variation, Zollner Gambit (ECO B73).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Ivan Zilic vs Goran Segovic, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.