Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski
2009 · Result ½–½ · French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Olgierd Zielinski (1961)
- Black
- Waldemar Jagodzinski (2066)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16)
About this chess game
This chess game between Olgierd Zielinski (1961) and Waldemar Jagodzinski (2066) was played in 2009 and finished ½–½. The opening was the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (C16). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Olgierd Zielinski games or Waldemar Jagodzinski games? This Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski?
Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski (2009) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski?
The game opened with the French Defense: Winawer Variation, Advance Variation (ECO C16).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Olgierd Zielinski vs Waldemar Jagodzinski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.