Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola
5. Split Open 2015, 2015 · Result 0–1 · Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Albert Ziegler (2294)
- Black
- Alfredo Cacciola (2098)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- 5. Split Open 2015
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76)
About this chess game
This chess game between Albert Ziegler (2294) and Alfredo Cacciola (2098) was played at 5. Split Open 2015 in 2015 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (B76). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Albert Ziegler games or Alfredo Cacciola games? This Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola?
Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola (2015) finished 0–1, a win for Alfredo Cacciola.
What opening was played in Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Dragon Variation, Yugoslav Attack (ECO B76).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Albert Ziegler vs Alfredo Cacciola, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.