Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno
WCh w Blitz Final, 2010 · Result 0–1 · King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Natalia Zhukova (2499)
- Black
- Kateryna Lagno (2539)
- Result
- 0–1
- Event
- WCh w Blitz Final
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90)
About this chess game
This chess game between Natalia Zhukova (2499) and Kateryna Lagno (2539) was played at WCh w Blitz Final in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (E90). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Natalia Zhukova games or Kateryna Lagno games? This Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno?
Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Kateryna Lagno.
What opening was played in Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Normal Variation, Rare Defenses (ECO E90).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Natalia Zhukova vs Kateryna Lagno, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.