David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan
ACC Monday Nights 2025 | Spring, 2025 · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- David Junyang Zhu (1950)
- Black
- Raj Balakeyan (1649)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- ACC Monday Nights 2025 | Spring
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35)
About this chess game
This chess game between David Junyang Zhu (1950) and Raj Balakeyan (1649) was played at ACC Monday Nights 2025 | Spring in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (D35). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more David Junyang Zhu games or Raj Balakeyan games? This David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan?
David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan (2025) finished 1–0, a win for David Junyang Zhu.
What opening was played in David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Exchange Variation (ECO D35).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of David Junyang Zhu vs Raj Balakeyan, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.