Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin
2017 · Result 1–0 · Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Lulu Zhou Li (1928)
- Black
- Alvaro De La Aldea Martin (1605)
- Result
- 1–0
- Year
- 2017
- Opening
- Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66)
About this chess game
This chess game between Lulu Zhou Li (1928) and Alvaro De La Aldea Martin (1605) was played in 2017 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (C66). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Lulu Zhou Li games or Alvaro De La Aldea Martin games? This Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin?
Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin (2017) finished 1–0, a win for Lulu Zhou Li.
What opening was played in Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin?
The game opened with the Ruy Lopez: Berlin Defense, Improved Steinitz Defense (ECO C66).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Lulu Zhou Li vs Alvaro De La Aldea Martin, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.