Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae
13. LSS Anni P-00020, 2019 · Result 1–0 · Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Anatolij Zholob (2052)
- Black
- Eberhard Thomae (1695)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 13. LSS Anni P-00020
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58)
About this chess game
This chess game between Anatolij Zholob (2052) and Eberhard Thomae (1695) was played at 13. LSS Anni P-00020 in 2019 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (C58). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Anatolij Zholob games or Eberhard Thomae games? This Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae?
Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae (2019) finished 1–0, a win for Anatolij Zholob.
What opening was played in Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae?
The game opened with the Italian Game: Two Knights Defense, Polerio Defense (ECO C58).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Anatolij Zholob vs Eberhard Thomae, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.