Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman
date unknown · Result ½–½ · English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Valery S Zhidkov (2490)
- Black
- Jacov Yuhtman
- Result
- ½–½
- Opening
- English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Valery S Zhidkov (2490) and Jacov Yuhtman was played and finished ½–½. The opening was the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (A37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Valery S Zhidkov games or Jacov Yuhtman games? This Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman?
Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman?
The game opened with the English Opening: Symmetrical Variation, Three Knights, Fianchetto Variation (ECO A37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Valery S Zhidkov vs Jacov Yuhtman, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.