Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska
2009 · Result 0–1 · English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Emil Zhezhov (1791)
- Black
- Gabriela Koskoska (2182)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2009
- Opening
- English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25)
About this chess game
This chess game between Emil Zhezhov (1791) and Gabriela Koskoska (2182) was played in 2009 and finished 0–1. The opening was the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (A25). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Emil Zhezhov games or Gabriela Koskoska games? This Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska?
Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska (2009) finished 0–1, a win for Gabriela Koskoska.
What opening was played in Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska?
The game opened with the English Opening: King's English Variation, Reversed Closed Sicilian (ECO A25).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Emil Zhezhov vs Gabriela Koskoska, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.