Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich
2015 · Result ½–½ · Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Alexandra Zherebtsova (2213)
- Black
- Tatjana Vasilevich (2397)
- Result
- ½–½
- Year
- 2015
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37)
About this chess game
This chess game between Alexandra Zherebtsova (2213) and Tatjana Vasilevich (2397) was played in 2015 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (D37). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Alexandra Zherebtsova games or Tatjana Vasilevich games? This Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich?
Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich (2015) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Three Knights Variation (ECO D37).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Alexandra Zherebtsova vs Tatjana Vasilevich, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.