Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng
15. Nat Games Tm Prelim, 2025 · Result 1–0 · English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Yuanhe Zhao (2489)
- Black
- Jianxun Feng (1800)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- 15. Nat Games Tm Prelim
- Year
- 2025
- Opening
- English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17)
About this chess game
This chess game between Yuanhe Zhao (2489) and Jianxun Feng (1800) was played at 15. Nat Games Tm Prelim in 2025 and finished 1–0. The opening was the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (A17). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Yuanhe Zhao games or Jianxun Feng games? This Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng?
Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng (2025) finished 1–0, a win for Yuanhe Zhao.
What opening was played in Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng?
The game opened with the English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense, Queen's Indian Formation (ECO A17).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Yuanhe Zhao vs Jianxun Feng, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.