Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski
XXXVIII Zamenhofa Memorial, 2019 · Result ½–½ · Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Rafal Zgadzaj (2092)
- Black
- Artsiom Bialiauski (1944)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- XXXVIII Zamenhofa Memorial
- Year
- 2019
- Opening
- Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05)
About this chess game
This chess game between Rafal Zgadzaj (2092) and Artsiom Bialiauski (1944) was played at XXXVIII Zamenhofa Memorial in 2019 and finished ½–½. The opening was the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (E05). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Rafal Zgadzaj games or Artsiom Bialiauski games? This Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski?
Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski (2019) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski?
The game opened with the Catalan Opening: Open Defense, Classical Line (ECO E05).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Rafal Zgadzaj vs Artsiom Bialiauski, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.