Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen
Eger Open, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Jurij Zezulkin (2385)
- Black
- Peter Berntsen (2230)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Eger Open
- Opening
- Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63)
About this chess game
This chess game between Jurij Zezulkin (2385) and Peter Berntsen (2230) was played at Eger Open and finished 1–0. The opening was the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (B63). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Jurij Zezulkin games or Peter Berntsen games? This Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen?
Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen finished 1–0, a win for Jurij Zezulkin.
What opening was played in Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen?
The game opened with the Sicilian Defense: Richter-Rauzer Variation, Traditional Variation (ECO B63).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Jurij Zezulkin vs Peter Berntsen, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.