Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg
2010 · Result 0–1 · Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Wilfried Zellweger (2125)
- Black
- Harald, Dr. Joerg (2248)
- Result
- 0–1
- Year
- 2010
- Opening
- Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28)
About this chess game
This chess game between Wilfried Zellweger (2125) and Harald, Dr. Joerg (2248) was played in 2010 and finished 0–1. The opening was the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (C28). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Wilfried Zellweger games or Harald, Dr. Joerg games? This Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg?
Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg (2010) finished 0–1, a win for Harald, Dr. Joerg.
What opening was played in Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg?
The game opened with the Vienna Game: Stanley Variation, Three Knights Variation (ECO C28).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Wilfried Zellweger vs Harald, Dr. Joerg, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.