Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer
Oberpfalz Ch M3, date unknown · Result 1–0 · Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Patrick Zeitler (1882)
- Result
- 1–0
- Event
- Oberpfalz Ch M3
- Opening
- Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31)
About this chess game
This chess game between Patrick Zeitler (1882) and Bernhardt Schwarzfischer was played at Oberpfalz Ch M3 and finished 1–0. The opening was the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (D31). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Patrick Zeitler games or Bernhardt Schwarzfischer games? This Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer?
Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer finished 1–0, a win for Patrick Zeitler.
What opening was played in Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer?
The game opened with the Queen's Gambit Declined: Queen's Knight Variation (ECO D31).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Patrick Zeitler vs Bernhardt Schwarzfischer, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.