Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow
MT-Carls/B (GER), 2013 · Result ½–½ · King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94).
Turn this game into your next win
Replay Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow with deep analysis, save the moments that matter, fold the ideas into your own opening repertoire, and drill the positions until they're second nature. CipherChess turns the games you study into the results you get — free to start.
Start Free on CipherChessMore Games By These Players
Game details
- White
- Michael Zeihser (2180)
- Black
- John Ballow (2391)
- Result
- ½–½
- Event
- MT-Carls/B (GER)
- Year
- 2013
- Opening
- King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94)
About this chess game
This chess game between Michael Zeihser (2180) and John Ballow (2391) was played at MT-Carls/B (GER) in 2013 and finished ½–½. The opening was the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (E94). You can replay the full game move by move on the interactive board above, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to study every move with the Stockfish engine.
Looking for more Michael Zeihser games or John Ballow games? This Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow encounter is one of millions of chess games indexed in the CipherChess mega database. Browse both players' full records, the openings they play most, and head-to-head results, then load any game onto the board to prepare your own lines against the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense.
Frequently asked questions
Who won Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow?
Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow (2013) finished ½–½, and the game was drawn.
What opening was played in Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow?
The game opened with the King's Indian Defense: Orthodox Variation, Positional Defense (ECO E94).
Can I replay this chess game move by move?
Yes. Use the interactive board on this page to step through every move of Michael Zeihser vs John Ballow, or open it on the CipherChess analysis board to review it with the Stockfish engine.